DE

GLC8103 WiFi pigtail for a Canadian OEM

A 15 cm RG174 pigtail with MCX male on one end and an inline PCB + inductor on the other. Three sampling rounds, then a repeat order of 5,000 units.

Client
Canadian WiFi OEM
Region
Canada
Program
GLC8103 / GL8103-P5
Status
In production
Overview

15 cm RG174 pigtail with a PCB and inductor on one end

The customer builds WiFi equipment that operates on 2.4 and 5 GHz. They needed a short pigtail that goes from an MCX connector on their radio to a small PCB plus inductor assembly inside their device. The cable was off the shelf. The combination of the cable, the connector, and the inline PCB is what they could not source as one unit.

First batch shipped May 2026. Repeat order of 5,000 units followed in July.

Destructive pull test on the production sample
01Challenge

Standard pigtails did not survive the strain relief test

The customer’s QA spec required the RG174 cable to hold 15 lbf (6.8 kgf) for 10 seconds without separating from the PCB end. Off-the-shelf pigtails typically fail around 8–10 lbf at the cable-to-PCB joint, especially when the joint also carries an inline inductor.

There was a second issue. The PCB side needed to mate with an inductor that had been selected for a specific impedance on the 2.4–5 GHz band. A generic pigtail would either mis-terminate the inductor or pull the trace impedance out of spec during strain.

  • RG174, 15 cm, MCX male on the radio end
  • PCB + inductor assembly on the device end
  • Pull strength: 15 lbf for 10 s, no separation
  • Electrical match on 2.4–5 GHz with the customer’s inductor choice
Generic pigtails fail at the cable-to-PCB joint under load
02Solution

Three sample rounds, each one tied to a specific failure

We reworked the strain relief at the PCB end and matched the trace to the customer’s inductor. The first sample failed the electrical target — return loss was off, not the dimensions. The second sample cleared the electrical target but missed the dimensions on the PCB pad layout. The third sample passed both.

The strain relief used a dual over-mould at the PCB joint so the cable takes the load before the trace does. The inductor is positioned to keep the loop area small on the 5 GHz side.

  • Sample v1, March 13: electrical target missed, returned
  • Sample v2, April: pad layout mismatch, returned
  • Sample v3, May: both electrical and mechanical targets met
  • First PO 2,500 units, May 28
  • Repeat PO 5,000 units, July 14
Each round was returned with a single, specific failure to fix
03Results

What the customer got

25lbf+
Destructive pull-strength on sample (≈ 11.35 kgf)
7,500
Units in first batch and repeat (2,500 + 5,000)
3
Sampling rounds to sign-off
Sample v3 detail: customer sign-off in May 2026, repeat order in July

Specifications

ModelGLC8103 / GL8103-P5
CableRG174, 15 cm
Connector AMCX male
Connector BPCB + inductor assembly (customer-specified)
Operating band2.4–5 GHz (WiFi)
Pull strength spec15 lbf (6.8 kgf) hold 10 s, no separation
Pull strength measured25 lbf+ (≈ 11.35 kgf) on destructive test
First batch2,500 units, May 28, 2026
Repeat order5,000 units, July 14, 2026

Timeline

Jan 2026
Project kickoff. Spec, RG174 length, MCX connector confirmed.
Mar 13
Sample v1. Returned — electrical target missed.
Apr 2026
Sample v2. Returned — PCB pad layout off.
May 2026
Sample v3. Electrical and mechanical targets met.
May 28 → Jul 14
2,500 + 5,000. First PO and repeat.
From the program team
The pull target was 15 lbf. The sample we destructively tested broke past 25 lbf. That gave our QA team the margin they needed to release the build.
— Program engineering, Canada OEM
Get a Free Quote
🤖

LeHeng AI Assistant

Online · Always here to help

Hello! I'm LeHeng AI Assistant, specialized in antenna products. How can I help you today?
Scroll to Top